I agree with the article, so far as goes the assumption that media affects us. That can be seen, archivally, in the very earliest piece I’ve got up in the Papers section of the site, which is about technology in the writing process. Where I might disagree, though, is the assumption that “the Net” is one single thing or does one single thing to us. There are many internets for many kinds of users. There are the blog users, the printout users, Gutenberg.org readers, and so forth. While Google may do much to unite virtually everyone’s habits, there are still significant differences.
If we are to answer (or address) the article’s pessimism (the gist is yes, the internet is making us stupid), we need to look more carefully at the differences between how different people use different sites. Are there ways to organize information that will encourage critical thinking more than others? My guess is that, as with magazines, books, and everything else, it matters less that you do the internet than how.
]]>As ominous as that question sounds, it doesn’t seem that you’ve lost your soul. Maybe now you’re over a hump.
What does six months in NYC do to one’s fertility?
(You see how ominous that question can be?) ??