This could of course be a summary of the foundationalist critique of the whole pragmatist project:

Because of Menand’s focus on effect rather than content

And this is something I found with The Metaphysical Club as well:

the William James piece flounders because it doesn’t bother to explain exactly what James thought.

And this just plain makes my creationism nerve tickled:

Before opening this book I had never heard of James Conant or Christopher Lasch, and I had confused William Paley with Richard Leakey.

i remember quite distinctly writing this one morning after finishing some other essay for a class.
On a cursory read, I can’t think of a single way in which what i wrote relates to what you just wrote.
Hmm…..hmm….well, now I’ve forgotten what I wrote already. I like your line, “satyagraha is the story of its grasp on us.” thanks

https://www.yalereviewofbooks.com/archive/winter03/review09.shtml.htm