Brown is explicit about this mission. He isn’t a serious novelist, but he’s a deadly serious writer: His thrilling plots, he’s said, are there to make the books’ didacticism go down easy, so that readers don’t realize till the end “how much they are learning along the way.” He’s working in the same genre as Harlan Coben and James Patterson, but his real competitors are ideologues like Ayn Rand, and spiritual gurus like Eckhart Tolle and Deepak Chopra. He’s writing thrillers, but he’s selling a theology.
I’ve heard people suggest semiotics as something like symbology. But, so far as I know, semioticists read books by French theoretical anthropologists, they don’t run around interpreting ancient symbols.
]]>Your article is interesting and hits upon the key significance of Angels & Demons plot in its contextual reality. Religion and science play such a huge role in our lives especially in America where the debate between the two is so incredibly public. I don’t think, however, that most people who go see the movie or read the book connect the dots in this way. It is, in the end, a plot with the usual good vs. bad dichotomy after all.
[On an unrelated note: When people hear I study history in art, they always ask if I’ve read The Da Vinci Code which infuriates me especially since my speciality is Islamic art and architecture…]
]]>