{"id":1316,"date":"2009-12-18T10:47:56","date_gmt":"2009-12-18T14:47:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.therowboat.com\/?p=1316"},"modified":"2022-01-26T16:29:53","modified_gmt":"2022-01-26T20:29:53","slug":"the-irrelevance-of-proof-to-the-holiday-spirit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nathanschneider.info\/2009\/12\/the-irrelevance-of-proof-to-the-holiday-spirit\/","title":{"rendered":"The Irrelevance of Proof to the Holiday Spirit"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"SantaI’ve got a zany new essay<\/a> at Religion Dispatches <\/em>today about a lecture earlier this week in Brooklyn, “A Philosophical Proof of Santa Claus.” Jamie Hook, the evening’s presenter, did a masterful job of miming some of the issues at play in debates about God\u2014though in the guise of a fellow whose existence, this season at least, is for many people a somewhat more urgent question.<\/p>\n

Mr. Hook, who describes himself as a \u201csocially omnivorous urban dandy,\u201d began this \u201cpassion play for the non-believer\u201d with a story of loss of faith: the memory of telling a seven-year-old boy that Santa Claus doesn\u2019t exist and subsequently watching him fall into a two-week depression. \u201cWe had made his world smaller,\u201d Hook remembers. He devised this lecture, following the suggestion of Rainer Maria Rilke, to \u201crestore enchantment to the world.\u201d<\/p>\n

Hook promptly proceeded to a Wikipedia-style historical sketch of the origin of the idea of Santa Claus, followed by a 12-minute original anthropological video of actual, believing children articulating the substance of their Christmastime convictions. These two accounts were utterly at odds. The children didn\u2019t hesitate to delve into amazing speculations about how Santa may have once been an ordinary man, or preceded the evolution of the human race, or came from a supernova-ed star long ago. None of them, significantly, were willing to either question their belief in Santa or to prove it\u2014aside from the testimony of having seen him at school or the remains of his nocturnal deliveries at home. As Hook pressed them from behind the camera to explain, the children only became firmer in their self-assurance.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Read the rest<\/a> at RD.
\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\"SantaI’ve got a zany new essay<\/a> at Religion Dispatches <\/em>today about a lecture earlier this week in Brooklyn, “A Philosophical Proof of Santa Claus.” Jamie Hook, the evening’s presenter, did a masterful job of miming some of the issues at play in debates about God\u2014though in the guise of a fellow whose existence, this season at least, is for many people a somewhat more urgent question.<\/p>\n

Mr. Hook, who describes himself as a \u201csocially omnivorous urban dandy,\u201d began this \u201cpassion play for the non-believer\u201d with a story of loss of faith: the memory of telling a seven-year-old boy that Santa Claus doesn\u2019t exist and subsequently watching him fall into a two-week depression. \u201cWe had made his world smaller,\u201d Hook remembers. He devised this lecture, following the suggestion of Rainer Maria Rilke, to \u201crestore enchantment to the world.\u201d<\/p>\n

Hook promptly proceeded to a Wikipedia-style historical sketch of the origin of the idea of Santa Claus, followed by a 12-minute original anthropological video of actual, believing children articulating the substance of their Christmastime convictions. These two accounts were utterly at odds. The children didn\u2019t hesitate to delve into amazing speculations about how Santa may have once been an ordinary man, or preceded the evolution of the human race, or came from a supernova-ed star long ago. None of them, significantly, were willing to either question their belief in Santa or to prove it\u2014aside from the testimony of having seen him at school or the remains of his nocturnal deliveries at home. As Hook pressed them from behind the camera to explain, the children only became firmer in their self-assurance.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Read the rest<\/a> at RD.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[37,11,31,100,44],"class_list":["post-1316","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-posts","tag-atheism","tag-existence-of-god","tag-new-york-city","tag-performance","tag-psychology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nathanschneider.info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1316"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nathanschneider.info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nathanschneider.info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nathanschneider.info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nathanschneider.info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1316"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/nathanschneider.info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1316\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5521,"href":"https:\/\/nathanschneider.info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1316\/revisions\/5521"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nathanschneider.info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1316"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nathanschneider.info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1316"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nathanschneider.info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1316"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}